Pearson Butler

Souree Valenzuela

3 weeks ago

We had an excellent experience working with Jason Sterzer to set up our trust and plan for our family’s future. From start to finish, he was extremely professional, knowledgeable, and patient in answering all of our questions. Estate planning can feel overwhelming, but Jason made the entire process clear, organized, and stress-free. He took the time to thoroughly explain the difference between a Will and a Trust. We learned that while a Will outlines your wishes and distributes assets after death, it still goes through probate, which can be time-consuming and public. A Trust, on the other hand, allows assets to pass directly to beneficiaries without probate, offers greater privacy, can reduce delays and costs, and provides more control over how and when assets are distributed. Understanding these benefits gave us real peace of mind about protecting our family. Jason’s expertise and attention to detail gave us complete confidence that everything was done correctly and tailored to our needs. We truly feel prepared and secure knowing our affairs are in order. We highly recommend Jason Sterzer to anyone looking for trustworthy, knowledgeable, and professional guidance in estate planning. He is outstanding at what he does. Thank you Jason for your services!

ghosty ghost

3 months ago

lol top recommendation for contingency based estate lawyers, butttt they arent contingency based and you cant get a consult for the most basic estate help?? i called, some girl answered with poor customer service. its like you could hear the gen Z stare through the line. i tell her i need a consult with an estate lawyer, she asks if i need a probate lawyer. I say im uninterested in reopening probate and that I just need some things looked into. i ask about contingency based, she says "we dont do that" i ask why their entire ad says "dont pay unless we win" if its not true, she says nothing. like literally a whole minute of dead silence. i tell her id like a consult with an estate attorney regardless. she sends me a questionaire asking who i want to sue and why? (i dont want to sue anyone? we just need help looking into trusts and life insurance) but i fill out the questionaire anyways, explaining the situation reiterating that we need help looking for life insurance and trusts. you know, that thing thats pretty much the entire job of an estate attorney? i receive an email back basically saying "none of the lawyers here can help, but good luck with the lawsuit" (which again, theres no lawsuit??) im not sure if the receptionists are just illiterate? but its laughable to advertise yourself as a contingency based estate attorney, while not being contingency based AND unable to do the most basic estate lookup. all this to say, if you need someone to look into your grandparents life insurance policies, this aint the place that can help you lol

davidkj7

4 months ago

If you are on a Met Life Legal, do not call this law office. They will decline providing you services, despite being listed as a participating firm. On two occasions, after telling them my name, the first question they asked was, “Are you a legal plan member.” The first time I called they straight up told me they weren’t taking on legal plan clients. The second time I called, a week later to see if I could get someone new on the line, the intake person asked the same legal plan question before asking the attorney if they were taking on new family law clients for a name change. I’m thinking my answer to the legal plan question was the determining factor the second time too.

Chase Hogenson

2 months ago

Mr. Webb was very in questions I had regarding trademarks and businesses. Very down to earth and easy to talk to, if I'm starting something fresh I'm going through these guys!

Michelle Almeida

10 months ago

I hired Mary Bevan to represent me during my divorce. While she initially presented a positive outlook and said she would advocate for a fair outcome, the reality was far different. Her communication throughout the process was minimal, and during mediation, she admitted to taking her sick child to daycare, which I feel, motivated her to finish fast that day. She encouraged me to accept an extremely one-sided settlement: minimal child support and alimony, no back pay, and no share of funds my ex withdrew from our accounts or retirement. Despite having strong evidence (including video of infidelity), she repeatedly dismissed its relevance and downplayed my concerns. She also failed to properly investigate significant financial discrepancies—over $60,000 in unexplained income on my ex’s bank statements. I left mediation feeling blindsided, unsupported, and trapped. I called immediately afterward trying to withdraw my consent to the agreement, but was told I could not. Looking back, I wish I had a stronger advocate—someone who understood my situation and fought for a truly fair outcome. I do not recommend her to others going through divorce, especially if you're in a vulnerable financial or emotional position.