The Law Offices Of Peter Van Aulen

Sara Omar

2 months ago

Peter Van Aulen handled my custody case, and even though it was a tough one, he always did his best for me. He’s very knowledgeable, knows what he’s doing, and truly listens. He respected my concerns, never pressured me, and always made sure I was comfortable with every step. His secretary, Debbie, is also so amazing she is warm, helpful, and will always do everything she can to assist you!

Christine Ellinger

6 months ago

Mr. Van Aulen handled my Hudson County divorce after I had moved to NV. He is very knowledgeable, honest and had my best interest as a priority. This entire process was new for me, and he made me feel comfortable every step of the way. I don’t know what I would’ve done without him. And his staff! Debbie is absolutely wonderful. She always made me feel like I was a priority. I’d like to say I will definitely use Peter’s services again, but I hope I never have to. 😊

L R

7 months ago

On June 3, 2025, I consulted Mr. Peter Van Aulen about legal representation in a matter. On June 4th, I received the Retainer Agreement. On careful review of the Retainer Agreement, I found that 2/3 of the Retainer focused exclusively on Legal Fees, Costs and Expenses, Bills and Other Legal Services, with no detailed description on Scope of Work. Mr. Van Aulen requested a $6,000.00 retainer fee and said nothing more than the payment will go toward fees and expenses according to the Agreement. I had no written assurance that Mr. Van Aulen understood my specific goals and objectives. Despite good faith attempts at getting Mr. Van Aulen to include Scope of Work in the Retainer Agreement, he refused. I decided to pursue another attorney. Mr. Van Aulen may be a good attorney, but his unwillingness to provide me with a detailed plan was unacceptable to me. This was very telling and unfortunate. I do not recommend The Law Office of Mr. Peter Van Aulen for this alone. Dear Reader: In response to Mr. Van Aulen reply, consider what he said. “We do not provide a “detailed plan” in a retainer agreement because we formulate the same after we been retained, review both parties’ Case Information Statements, review all relevant documents and further consultation with the client.” In effect, Mr. Van Aulen is saying pay me now and worry about the details after the fact, whereas I maintain that memorialization of Scope of Work is critical upfront, not on the backend, to ensure that he understood the goals and objectives discussed. I have made meaning business happen for both small and large companies, and under no circumstances would a business partner enter into a contractual agreement without a “detailed plan” as Mr. Van Aulen puts it, or a Scope of Work as I put. In closing, my review is based solely on “my” personal experience; it is not intended to disparage or defame Mr. Van Aulen. This is nothing more than a matter of differing perspectives, or expectations. I wish Mr. Van Aulen the best. You the reader can draw your own conclusions.

Mike Attanasio

a year ago

Peter Van Aulen was my attorney during my divorce in 2019. I was very satisfied with the outcome and the support he provided along the way. He was able to help keep me calm and maintain a positive outlook during a very difficult time, and I recommend him as a divorce lawyer to anyone who needs his services.

Jason K

a year ago

I had 2 lawyers before Mr. Van Aulen represented me. One moved out of state and 2nd ghosted me. I was pretty much on race against time, and out of many lawyers around my area, I have found Mr. Van Aulen, and decided to put my faith on his hands. He got thrown into my case and the judge was just giving us limited time to get everything together. Mr. Van Aulen was able to get the job done in timely manner. He was great to work with, gave me all my realistic options, and was truthful with me. I am very thankful, and very relieved everything is over. Thank you!